<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/css" href="/stylesheets/rss.css"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:trackback="http://madskills.com/public/xml/rss/module/trackback/">
  <channel>
    <title>Floehopper: RSpec/Mocha compatibility</title>
    <link>http://blog.floehopper.org/articles/2007/04/04/rspec-mocha-compatibility</link>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <ttl>40</ttl>
    <description>thoughts on the bergy bits of life</description>
    <item>
      <title>RSpec/Mocha compatibility</title>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;The &lt;a href="http://rspec.rubyforge.org/"&gt;RSpec&lt;/a&gt; team have just &lt;a href="http://www.nabble.com/forum/ViewPost.jtp?post=9843184"&gt;announced&lt;/a&gt; a beta version of their pending 0.9 release.&lt;/p&gt;


	&lt;p&gt;Apparently&amp;#8230;&lt;/p&gt;


	&lt;blockquote&gt;
		&lt;p&gt;You can now use &lt;a href="http://mocha.rubyforge.org"&gt;Mocha&lt;/a&gt; by saying &lt;div class="typocode"&gt;&lt;pre&gt;&lt;code class="typocode_ruby "&gt;&lt;span class="ident"&gt;config&lt;/span&gt;&lt;span class="punct"&gt;.&lt;/span&gt;&lt;span class="ident"&gt;mock_with&lt;/span&gt; &lt;span class="symbol"&gt;:mocha&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/code&gt;&lt;/pre&gt;&lt;/div&gt; in a &lt;div class="typocode"&gt;&lt;pre&gt;&lt;code class="typocode_ruby "&gt;&lt;span class="ident"&gt;spec_helper&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/code&gt;&lt;/pre&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
	&lt;/blockquote&gt;


	&lt;p&gt;Sounds good :-)&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 04 Apr 2007 16:11:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">urn:uuid:35f2f24f-a450-4a06-aa0e-754de3e55f0d</guid>
      <author>James Mead</author>
      <link>http://blog.floehopper.org/articles/2007/04/04/rspec-mocha-compatibility</link>
      <category>mocha</category>
      <category>rspec</category>
      <category>compatibility</category>
      <category>mock</category>
      <category>testing</category>
      <category>bdd</category>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>"RSpec/Mocha compatibility" by James Mead</title>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;Sorry to hear that. Personally I don&amp;#8217;t use RSpec and hence don&amp;#8217;t know much about its internals. So you&amp;#8217;d be better off asking about this on the &lt;a href="http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/rspec-users"&gt;RSpec mailing list&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 17 May 2007 05:17:28 +0000</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">urn:uuid:f532851a-842c-4569-b132-7e3a8fa8c45c</guid>
      <link>http://blog.floehopper.org/articles/2007/04/04/rspec-mocha-compatibility#comment-267</link>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>"RSpec/Mocha compatibility" by Roman Gonzalez</title>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;There is a problem when you use mocha with rspec, it seems that response.should be_xxx does not work, cause they are rspec mock objects&amp;#8230; that kinda sucks :-(&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 14 May 2007 10:03:20 +0000</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">urn:uuid:e7a50123-f8ba-4407-8ccd-57aa742d559c</guid>
      <link>http://blog.floehopper.org/articles/2007/04/04/rspec-mocha-compatibility#comment-263</link>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
